Radioactive dating disproved
Radioactive dating disproved - dating service nude sex
Radiometric dating of rocks and minerals using naturally occurring, long-lived radioactive isotopes is troublesome for young-earth creationists because the techniques have provided overwhelming evidence of the antiquity of the earth and life.Some so-called creation scientists have attempted to show that radiometric dating does not work on theoretical grounds (for example, Arndts and Overn 1981; Gill 1996) but such attempts invariably have fatal flaws (see Dalrymple 1984; York and Dalrymple 2000).
The creationist approach of focusing on examples where radiometric dating yields incorrect results is a curious one for two reasons.
A swimming race illustrates the simple principles involved in measuring time.
This swimmer is competing in a 1,500 metre race and we have an accurate, calibrated wristwatch.
Protons and neutrons make up the center (nucleus) of the atom, and electrons form shells around the nucleus.
The number of protons in the nucleus of an atom determines the element.
This has caused many in the church to reevaluate the biblical creation account, specifically the meaning of the word “day” in Genesis 1.
With our focus on one particular form of radiometric dating—carbon dating—we will see that carbon dating strongly supports a young earth.
Scientists use a technique called radiometric dating to estimate the ages of rocks, fossils, and the earth.
Many people have been led to believe that radiometric dating methods have proved the earth to be billions of years old.
We note that at the instant the swimmer touches the edge of the pool our wristwatch reads and 53 seconds.
How long has the competitor taken to swim the 1,500 metre race?
In last Tuesday’s lecture, radiocarbon dating was covered briefly.